|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
435
|
Posted - 2015.11.02 18:07:32 -
[1] - Quote
Another Quote of CCP:
Nothing is unthinkable.
As i understood bumping will get some rework. Nothing bad with that.
Atomic Virulent : "You can't spell DOUCHE. without CODE."
|

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
435
|
Posted - 2015.11.02 18:46:51 -
[2] - Quote
Tengu Grib wrote:The concept of reworking bumping mechanics... Maybe I'm ok with it? It would be nice not to fly right through ships anymore for instance.
Without bumping we'd have to go back to the days of alpha nados for killing freighters.
"Just one more nerf, that's what Eve needs. Just one more..."
Eve is getting safer and safer, and subscription numbers aren't really going up are they?
Are you sad? This does not sound like you are OK? Remember: "Broadcast for reps"!
There are far more, far interesting changes in the next time. I like those Ideas CCP came up with.
And one post "No 5 is alive" suggests subscriber numbers *are* rising. I would think most ppl will not miss bumping that is replaced by better mechanics.
Atomic Virulent : "You can't spell DOUCHE. without CODE."
|

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
437
|
Posted - 2015.11.02 21:16:17 -
[3] - Quote
Bumping just doesn't look or "feel" right. Shooting ships like playing bowling. Ball hits Pins, Pins fall away...
Anyway. As always the best solution for the game, is the solution which satifies wether the bumper nor the bumpee but adds content.
Atomic Virulent : "You can't spell DOUCHE. without CODE."
|

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
437
|
Posted - 2015.11.03 08:07:21 -
[4] - Quote
oh very nice! outdated and not the fact anymore. short and cryptic. i would translate as: we are not happy how bumping actually works and are rethinking things. i am curious about the outcome.
Atomic Virulent : "You can't spell DOUCHE. without CODE."
|

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
438
|
Posted - 2015.11.04 03:33:58 -
[5] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:Siegfried Cohenberg wrote:CCP will never remove freighter bumping from the game. There needs to be a certain level of risk when flying a freighter. There is. You are spending $15 a month to watch planets go past your ship, very, very slowly. One thing to consider: How would bumping be changed? What I like: If you initiate warp, after some longish time, you will always warp, irrelevant of your velocity. Say, after two minutes. With this change, a ship on autopilot, heading for the gate, is still just as vulnerable as now. Also, a ship being piloted can still be delayed from entering warp, giving time for proper tackle to arrive. But endlessly bumping a ship, with little recourse for the pilot, goes away.
yes, i like that too. thats what i am talikng of. wether bumpers nor freighters get anything for free, or are given what they wish.
lovely those end of eve tears from some ppl.
Atomic Virulent : "You can't spell DOUCHE. without CODE."
|

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
442
|
Posted - 2015.11.05 15:04:24 -
[6] - Quote
Black Pedro wrote:Demerius Xenocratus wrote:Freighter bumping is aggression-free tackle. That's problematic. You shouldn't be able to tackle another ship permanently without consequences. Why? ...Snipped the blah...
Because everything in EvE has usually consequences. Guys like you demand consequences for other stuff but if you need to adapt, you want to get picky.
Always telling others that are possibilities to avoid bumping, avoiding and ignoring, that bumping is a risk free game mechanic. And once again, guys like you, love to sing songs about how you hate those risk averse ppl and how to force them to fight, ignoring all reasonable arguments. So you hate risk avoiding ppl, but of course it is alright if it suits you.
That behavior does not make you evil, it makes you pathetic.
Atomic Virulent : "You can't spell DOUCHE. without CODE."
|

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
442
|
Posted - 2015.11.05 15:27:51 -
[7] - Quote
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:La Rynx wrote:....That behavior does not make you evil, it makes you pathetic. Says the dude hiding out in an NPC corp lol Scrubalicous, really. Thank you for that.
Oh please, you are welcome. I am not hiding, i am stating my own opinion and do not need the backup of my alliance to boost it.
You obviously have not realized, that NPC arguments makes *you* pathetic since you have no other argument to bring up? Time to wake up, only kindergarden kids, codies and their friends from C&P give a "shi-t", because they have no good arguments.
Black Pedro wrote:So much anger. I suggest ...
Have you any idea how hard the codie-bullshit-BINGO is ringing whith your arguments?
Apropos hiding... Why are you not in any corp of the codie alliance? You are very very obviously more than friend to them?

Why oh why should *WE* be angry? Changes to bumping are bad for you, not "us".

Atomic Virulent : "You can't spell DOUCHE. without CODE."
|

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
442
|
Posted - 2015.11.05 15:35:11 -
[8] - Quote
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:La Rynx wrote:reeeeee reeeeee reeeee Fixed your spelling for you.
Sweet. but no arguments. Get your posts ready to be deleted.
Atomic Virulent : "You can't spell DOUCHE. without CODE."
|
|
|
|